Reading Between the Baselines: K/9 is an outdated metric

March 20, 2007
Note: I used IP*3+BB for PA, which is obviously incorrect. I'll fix this and repair the article as soon as I can. While this mistake makes it tough to calibrate to K/PA, my point remains the same...Ks per batter faced are more telling than Ks without factoring in BB.

Scott Elbert’s 10.66 strikeout per nine ratio put him among the minor league’s elite last season – 8th best of the pitchers in our Top 100. That doesn’t mean squat.

It’s not every day that I pick up an entirely new lens with which to evaluate prospects. A few weeks ago I had one of those days.

For the past six months I’ve primarily gone by a combination of strikeouts per nine (K/9), walks and hits per inning pitched (WHIP), and HR per nine (HR/9) in my prospect ranking. My goal was to use these stats to distinguish the pitching prospects with the best stuff, command, and ability to keep hitters off balance.

I’m beginning to realize – thanks in large to Baseball America’s Matt Eddy – that while strikeouts per nine can be interesting to look at, the stat has two major flaws:

1) No one actually throws nine innings every start.

2) A pitcher who dances around the strike zone could wind up with a better K/9 than a pitcher who attacks the zone.

Player 06 K/PA 06 K/9 Level(s)
Yovani Gallardo 31.6% 10.91 A+/AA
Jacob McGee 30.9% 11.49 A
Phil Hughes 30.7% 10.36 A+/AA
Matt Garza 29.7% 10.21 A+/AA/AAA
Brandon Erbe 29.4% 10.44 A
Scott Elbert 29.1% 10.66 A+/AA
Homer Bailey 28.4% 10.16 A+/AA
Franklin Morales 27.4% 10.46 A/A+
Adam Miller 25.4% 9.15 AA/AAA
Nick Adenhart 23.0% 8.24 A/A+
* numbers are combined minor league from 2006

So what’s a better indicator of raw stuff, command, and ability to fool hitters? Strikeouts per plate appearance – or K/PA.

 
Exemplified in the chart to the left, K/PA embodies elements of command as well as stuff. It works as a much better tool for evaluating prospects than K/9. (You can calculate K/PA by 1) Dividing the amount of hits a pitcher gives up by his batting average against 2) Adding walks to the number that you got in step 1 3) Dividing the pitcher's strikeout total by the number that you got in step 2.)

Yeah, going from K/9 to K/PA is as much of a chore as switching to the metric system, but the world works on metric for a reason.

 
Notes about my ranking system
Though K/PA leaves me with two statistics that factor in walks, I don’t think it will force me to alter my current formula for evaluating pitchers – may just require some minor weighting tweakage. Also, I may try going with batting average against rather than WHIP.

Player 06 HR/PA 06 HR/9 Level(s)
Brandon Erbe 0.44% 0.16 A
Nick Adenhart 0.48% 0.17 A/A+
Phil Hughes 0.91% 0.31 A+/AA
Yovani Gallardo 1.01% 0.35 A+/AA
Matt Garza 1.16% 0.12 A+/AA/AAA
Jacob McGee 1.27% 0.47 A
Homer Bailey 1.27% 0.45 A+/AA
Franklin Morales 1.38% 0.53 A/A+
Adam Miller 1.42% 0.51 AA/AAA
Scott Elbert 2.52% 0.92 A+/AA
* numbers are combined minor league from 2006

 
It should also be noted that I’m going to recalibrate to HR/PA rather than HR/9, as well. I’m pretty sure that it’s going to take years – if not decades – to help lead the anti-ERA charge, but I’m also going to try to lean on ERA/GS and ER/IP from here on out.

 
Adam Foster is here to help if you're having trouble parting with K/9. You can email him at adamwfoster@gmail.com.